Are pre-school children too young to be taught scientific principles or is it a moral issue? - young pre t
I think the most that the students oral communication skills, general culture learning, as "hot things burn, do not touch, and the difference between good and evil. This is where religion is often used, because religion is a very primitive but effective way to teach children the difference between good and evil. "Since the religion that is opposed to science in general, is the reason why children learn in preschool is usually nothing of the science, because the company has to be immoral to teach preschool children about science?
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Young Pre T Are Pre-school Children Too Young To Be Taught Scientific Principles Or Is It A Moral Issue?
11 comments:
Interesting idea.
This is the reason that preschool children often know nothing about science, because the company has considered unethical to preschool children learn science?
No, this is not the reason for pre-school children learn a lot about science. Not taught in depth things about science, because they have to understand without prior knowledge base. It's like you 4 years to teach in the law of gravity, to speak of Sir Isaac Newton and an apple fell on his head, but you can not teach how molecules combine to form different compounds and how the law of gravity works on the difference between the mass of the Earth has a certain appeal, while the moon has a small tear.
Preschool children are too young to be taught
scientific principles or a moral issue?
- You're never too young to understand scientific principles.
This is the reason that children under school age do not usually learn about the science, because the company has to teach himself as immoral, pre-school children about science?
- Only in America. * Sigh * Although more than one reason.
This is probably why some parents decide not to teach their children about science. I think the most important reason is the ability to understand. Most children have no interest in understanding not to the mental capacity to many principles of science, to mention. Some children are those who wish to ask questions and understand.
This is probably why some parents decide not to teach their children about science. I think the most important reason is the ability to understand. Most children have no interest in understanding not to the mental capacity to many principles of science, to mention. Some children are those who wish to ask questions and understand.
Meh, I do not think its wrong its just that some, perhaps even in. You can not just say, 'Here's how it works, because then they ask why and when they explain that it's a good chance they are confused.
Moreover, if they can learn what they are doing very well.
Until a person, the formal operational stage of cognitive development, have achieved the teaching of science of minor importance.
Preschool children are too young to teach scientific principles or a moral issue?
Not if they are children of hybrids.
WTF?
They teach children of preschool age appropriate. And the alphabet, but that's all.
I hate religion. Why not let live and live?
I ask the same question. Until this is what I came with:'s children discover the world through play and experience. You also need the right word. For example, my 3 years old, lay in his chair. I said: 'If the edge of the chair, you can lose balance and drop your weight. When they (inevitably fall) have received a lesson in the laws of physics and now a word for it.
A child of preschool age can easily understand simple cause and effect, if-then argument. When you've finished your dinner, then you can have dessert () understand my 1 year. In essence, the child has the opportunity to explore the world without borders to learn to like science or not.
Whether religion has nothing to do, it could be. Religion has learned to believe without evidence, the science says: "Show me the evidence, I think. Science is a natural for children, religion is something that must be specifically taught.
Oh ya, and said: You need to ReligIons, which is a moral person?
Post a Comment